Under Secretary of State Christian Herter, "Memorandum of Conference with Admiral Strauss," 2 August 1957, with memoranda by Executive Secretary Fisher Howe attached, Confidential

Source: Under Secretary of State Christian Herter, "Memorandum of Conference with Admiral Strauss," 2 August 1957, with memoranda by Executive Secretary Fisher Howe attached, Confidential Date: Aug 2, 1957 Archive: RG 59, Central Decimal Files, 1955-1959, 398.1901-IAEA/8-257 Collection: 60th Anniversary of the International Atomic Energy Agency Oct 26, 2017

---

Editorial Analysis

Original analysis by the DriftSeas editorial desk. The complete primary-source document, transcribed from the National Security Archive scan, appears in full below.

A White House Decision on the IAEA’s First Director General

On 2 August 1957 Under‑Secretary of State Christian Herter recorded a terse conversation with Admiral Lewis Strauss, the President’s chief military adviser on atomic matters. The memo reveals a moment when the Eisenhower administration turned a nascent multilateral institution—the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)—into a subtle arena of Cold‑War bargaining. After a private conference with President Dwight D. Eisenhower, Strauss returned to the State Department to convey the President’s strategic calculus: the United States would nominate Congressman W. Sterling Cole for the agency’s top civil post, but would refuse to discuss any other staffing choices until the Soviet Union demonstrated “support…by making fissionable material available.”

Herter’s note is more than a procedural record; it captures the intertwining of domestic politics, inter‑agency rivalry, and super‑power brinkmanship. The President’s insistence on securing Congressman Joseph Martin’s blessing before advancing Cole underscores a lingering concern for congressional optics. Eisenhower had previously promised Martin not to place sitting House members in executive roles, a pledge that now required a “later conversation” with General Persons to clarify that the IAEA nomination was not a presidential appointment but a diplomatic nomination. The memo therefore illuminates how even a seemingly technical appointment was filtered through the lens of American legislative‑executive relations.

The Cold‑War Context of the IAEA’s Birth

The IAEA, formally established in 1957, was the first global body tasked with promoting peaceful nuclear energy while preventing diversion to weapons. Its Governing Board, composed of the United States, the Soviet Union, the United Kingdom and other elected members, would elect a Director General. The United States and the USSR each sought a candidate who could steer the agency’s agenda without compromising national security. By mid‑1957 the United States had already signaled a willingness to cooperate on civilian nuclear development, yet Eisenhower remained wary of any Soviet leverage that might arise from staffing the agency.

Herter’s memorandum shows how the administration used the nomination process as leverage. The explicit condition that the Soviet delegation would only be “advised…that the United States did not wish to make any commitments with respect to any other staff personnel” unless the USSR supplied fissile material reflects Eisenhower’s broader “Atoms for Peace” strategy: encourage nuclear sharing, but only on terms that reinforced American dominance in the nuclear supply chain. The memo therefore serves as a concrete example of how the United States linked diplomatic goodwill to concrete material contributions, a pattern repeated in later negotiations over nuclear non‑proliferation.

Who Was Involved and What Their Words Reveal

Admiral Strauss, a senior Navy officer and former Director of the Office of Naval Research, acted as the President’s conduit to the State Department, illustrating the military’s direct hand in shaping nuclear diplomacy. Herter, then the Under‑Secretary for Political Affairs, functioned as the senior State official translating military counsel into diplomatic action. Fisher Howe, Executive Secretary of the State Department, is the bureaucratic footnote who ensured the memo’s distribution to Ambassador Wadsworth, the White House, and Brig. Gen. A. J. Goodpaster, highlighting the layered chain of command that insulated the President from direct involvement while preserving tight control over the message.

The language of the memo is deliberately diplomatic yet pointed. Phrases such as “feel that the Soviet Government was entitled to representation appropriate to the degree of support…by making fissionable material available” convey a conditional generosity that masks a clear warning: cooperation would be measured and rewarded. The repeated use of “confidential” and the careful routing of copies to military and diplomatic channels underscore the sensitivity of the issue and the administration’s desire to keep the negotiation out of public view.

Why This Memo Still Matters

The August 1957 memorandum is a micro‑cosm of how the United States managed the early Cold‑War nuclear order: by intertwining technical expertise, congressional politics, and strategic pressure on the Soviet Union. It foreshadows later episodes where staffing of international bodies became leverage—most notably the 1970s negotiations over the IAEA’s safeguards board and the 1990s debates over the International Criminal Court. Moreover, the document illustrates Eisenhower’s reliance on personal relationships (Strauss, Martin, Cole) to execute foreign policy, a pattern that shaped U.S. diplomatic practice for decades.

For scholars of Cold‑War diplomacy, the memo offers a rare glimpse into the backstage calculations that shaped the IAEA’s leadership and, by extension, the early architecture of the global nuclear regime. It reminds us that even institutions founded on lofty ideals of peaceful cooperation were, from the outset, arenas for power politics—a reality that continues to inform contemporary debates over nuclear governance.

---