White House, Memo, Charles Leppert, Special Assistant for Congressional Relations, to Jack Marsh, Counselor to the President, "Representative Bob McClory," September 17, 1975.

Source: White House, Memo, Charles Leppert, Special Assistant for Congressional Relations, to Jack Marsh, Counselor to the President, "Representative Bob McClory," September 17, 1975. Date: Sep 17, 1975 Archive: Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library: White House Operations, Congressional Relations Office, Loen & Leppert Files, Box 14, Folder, "Intelligence, House Select Committee, Handling and Release of Documents." Collection: The White House, the CIA and the Pike Committee, 1975 Jun 2, 2017

Editorial Analysis

Original analysis by the DriftSeas editorial desk. The complete primary-source document, transcribed from the National Security Archive scan, appears in full below.

A Memo from the Ford White House on the Pike Committee’s Document Fight

On September 17 1975 Charles Leppert, then Special Assistant for Congressional Relations, sent a terse memorandum to Counselor John O. Marsh. The note is a snapshot of the White House’s internal scramble to manage the fallout from the House Select Committee on Intelligence—popularly known as the Pike Committee—whose hearings had just exposed a trove of classified CIA and NSA material. Lepper’s memo, filed under “Intelligence, House Select Committee, Handling and Release of Documents,” asks Marsh to intervene on behalf of Representative Bob McClory, a member of the committee, regarding the procedures for de‑classifying and releasing the documents the committee had seized.

The memo emerged at the climax of a broader congressional‑executive clash that began in 1973 when the Senate’s Church Committee and the House’s Pike Committee launched parallel investigations into the intelligence community’s covert operations. Both committees were driven by revelations of illegal surveillance, assassination plots, and covert coups. Their work fundamentally reshaped the architecture of U.S. oversight, culminating in the 1978 Intelligence Oversight Act and the establishment of permanent intelligence committees in both chambers.

Leppert’s brief, however, reveals the day‑to‑day tension between the administration’s desire to protect national‑security secrets and Congress’s demand for transparency. By addressing Marsh—one of President Ford’s most trusted legal advisors—the memo underscores how the executive leaned on senior counsel to navigate a politically charged procedural dispute. The reference to “Representative Bob McClory” is telling: McClory, a Democrat from Ohio, was a vocal critic of the administration’s reluctance to release the Pike files. Leppert’s request to “assist” him suggests the White House was seeking a controlled concession, perhaps to placate the committee while preserving the most sensitive material.

Reading between the lines, the memo hints at a larger calculus. The phrase “HSC procedures & declassification & adm in documents” signals that the White House was already drafting a formal protocol for handling the seized records—a precursor to the later “Classified Information Procedures” that would become standard in congressional investigations. Leppert’s tone is pragmatic, not defensive; the administration was not outright denying the committee’s authority but was instead positioning itself as a cooperative partner, albeit one that wanted to dictate the pace and scope of disclosure.

The document also illustrates the internal hierarchy of the Ford administration’s congressional liaison apparatus. Leppert, a junior official, reports to Marsh, who in turn reports directly to the President. This chain of command demonstrates how seriously the White House took the issue: even routine memos about document handling required the counsel of the President’s top legal adviser.

Why does this memo matter today? First, it provides concrete evidence of the executive branch’s tactical response to the first major congressional intelligence inquiry. The Pike Committee’s aggressive subpoena power and public hearings forced the White House to confront a new reality—Congress could, and would, demand access to the most secret corners of the intelligence apparatus. Second, the memo foreshadows the institutional reforms that followed: the establishment of the Senate and House intelligence committees, the creation of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, and the codification of declassification guidelines that still govern the release of classified material.

Finally, the memo serves as a reminder that the balance between secrecy and accountability is not a static legal formula but a constantly negotiated process, mediated by personalities, political pressures, and procedural minutiae. The brief exchange between Leppert and Marsh encapsulates a pivotal moment when the United States began to institutionalize oversight of its covert operations—a legacy that continues to shape debates over whistleblowers, classified leaks, and the public’s right to know.

The Broader Context of 1975

By mid‑1975 the Ford administration was still reeling from Watergate, the Vietnam debacle, and the revelations of the Church and Pike committees. Public trust in intelligence agencies was at an all‑time low, and Congress was asserting its constitutional prerogative to check executive power. The memo reflects the administration’s attempt to regain a foothold by offering a managed declassification process, hoping to satisfy oversight demands without compromising ongoing covert activities.

Actors and Their Signals

• Charles Leppert – a career civil servant, his memo shows the routine yet politically charged nature of congressional liaison work.
• John O. Marsh – as Counselor to the President, his involvement indicates the legal weight the White House placed on the issue.
• Rep. Bob McClory – his name appears as the congressional point of contact, highlighting the personal dimension of inter‑branch negotiations.

The memo’s understated language masks a high‑stakes negotiation over the very definition of national security in a post‑Watergate America.

NATIONAL
SECURITY
ARCHIVE

National Security Archive,
Suite 701, Gelman Library, The George Washington University,
2130 H Street, NW, Washington, D.C., 20037,
Phone: 202/994-7000, Fax: 202/994-7005, nsarchiv@gwu.edu